Monday, October 27, 2014

Blind vs. conventional auditions

I have mixed feelings about blind auditions.  Although not knowing who is playing forces judges to evaluate a performance without preconceived notions of a player's ability clouding their judgment, there's something bizarre and artificial about walking into a sectioned-off cubicle to play Schubert excerpts.

I've only had two blind auditions, both for the same ensemble, when I was a teenager.  At the preliminary audition, I stood in a hallway while the orchestra director and section coach sat around the corner.  It was jarring to hear a disembodied voice say, "Just relax," before I began and equally disconcerting to hear the same voice say, "Thank you," from a distance.

Before I stepped onstage behind a partition to begin my final audition, the ensemble manager asked me if I had any questions.  I said, "Yes.  In this first excerpt, there are eight consecutive bars of rests.  Should I stand here silently for 32 seconds when those measures come up?  Should I skip them?  Should I start in a different place?  What should I do?"  She went to ask the judges.  When she came back, she told me the judges said I could start the excerpt after those eight bars.  To her credit, she also admitted that she had accidentally told them my name.  It might not have been a coincidence that I ended up with the same chair placement I had one year earlier.

Concerts and rehearsals take place in front of people, so playing before judges who can see you is a more realistic approximation of what it's like to perform.  Overall, though, I think blind auditions, when they're conducted properly, are fairer to the performers.